When Compliance Does Harm- New briefing paper
In complex emergencies like Myanmar’s, local aid workers and systems are essential to ensure
life-saving aid for civilian populations, whilst also contributing to longer-term civil society
strengthening, community development, and peacebuilding.
As well as being accountable to the communities they serve, local aid workers and systems must meet the compliance requirements of international funding agencies. But although compliance systems are
important to ensure the accountability and effectiveness of internationally funded aid
programs, international compliance frameworks are commonly experienced by local actors as
top-down, overly rigid, and unsuited to highly volatile and politically complex crises—and this
despite commitments made in the Grand Bargain to localise aid systems and to simplify and
streamline requirements like reporting.
Download full briefing paper below
Evidence from local actors in Myanmar demonstrates that, while established with good
intentions, international agencies’ frameworks and requirements can have unintended
negative consequences, causing harm for local systems and actors: they can impede funding
flows for essential aid delivery; they are often unfeasible in complex and unstable contexts;
they can undermine and divert essential resources from emergency responses; they can
increase security risks for local aid workers and vulnerable communities; they can preclude
local procurement and responses that strengthen local economies; they can erode trust in aid
partnerships; and they can push local actors toward ‘unethical’ practices.
These dynamics can in turn result in a situation where the primary imperative to ‘do no harm’ ends up being
subordinated to the compliance systems and fiduciary risk management of international
agencies. Additionally, top-down compliance systems can perpetuate unequal and unjust aid
relationships—ultimately, going against international commitments to localise aid systems and
practices.
As such, there is an urgent need for international agencies to apply a Do No Harm
approach in reviewing and imposing compliance requirements, to be more flexible, and to work
with local actors in developing compliance frameworks that strengthen rather than undermine
local systems and approaches.
Comments